Published on Hazen Research (https://www.hazenresearch.com)


Patent Number/Link: 
3,359,067 Method for the recovery of calcium phosphates from high lime content phosphate ores

r

United States Patent Office 3,359,067

Patented Dec. 19, 1967

1 2

Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide

an economically feasible method for producing usable

phosphates from 'phosphate ores, in which sulfurous acid

is used as the leaching agent.

It is another object of this invention to provide a

method for recovering usable phosphates from low-grade

phosphate ore utilizing sulfurous acid as the leaching

agent in which the sulfur dioxide used to form the sulfurous

acid can be .recovered and cycled for reuse in the

10 process.

It is another object of this invention to provide a process

for recovering usable phosphates from low-grade phosphate

are in which suHur dioxide is used as the leaching

agent to form sulfites and phosphates in solution which

15 can be separated and isolated and the sulfur dioxide recovered

from the sulfite for reuse in the process.

The above objects are accomplished by the method of

this invention which, for the purposes of explanation, can

be considered to comprise three steps, namely, a leaching

20 step, a separation step and a sulfur dioxide recovery step.

In the preferred modification of the leaching step, sulfur

dioxide is bubbled through a water slurry of the ore at

a 15: 1 dilution for 24 hours at a temperature of 4 0 centigrade

and a pH of about 1 to form a solution which is

25 essentially mono-calcium phosphate and calcium bi-sulfite,

Alternatively, dilutions of at least 5: 1 of ore to slurry

may ·be used accompanied by successive extractions. In

the separation step, the usable phosphate in the form of

phosphoric acid is separated ,by solvent extraction by

30 means of an organic solvent or other conventional process.

The sulfite remaining after removal of the phosphate

is recovered by conventional methods and heated to recover

sulfur dioxide for reuse in the process in accordance

with well known procedures.

The following reaction is postulated as occurring in

the reaction between phosphate ore and sulfurous acid:

Caa(P04)2+4S02+4H20=Ca(H2P04)2+2Ca(HSOg)2

The Ca(HSOah is broken down with heat as follows:

Ca(HSOg)2+heat=2CaO+4S02+2H20

By recycling the sulfur dioxide for ,reuse, it is apparent

that reagent consumption is reduced to a minimum.

The invention is illustrated by the treatment O'f Wyo-

45 ming high-lime phosphoria formation rock. The rock is

low in phosphate content and high in lime which makes

the use of ,a standard sulfuric acid process for producing

phosphoric acid or phosphate fertilizers higher in cost

than if a commercial 31% P205 ore were available as a

50 feed. The lime content of the are, as well as the final

form in which the phosphate is produced, determines the

net acid consumption. The rock used analyzed 21.2%

P205'

As to the leaching step, early experiments established

55 that the phosphate ote is readily attacked by acids even

at a low temperature if the pH is low. If the ,acid which

is used to promote this attack also converts the calcium

to a compound which can be decomposed by heat, it

offers a possibility of cheap recovery of the acid for

60 reuse. An acid which offers this possibility is sulfurous

acid. If it is strong enough to attack the phosphate, it

should form mono-calcium phosphate or phosphoric acid

and at the same time calcium sulfite or calcium bi-sulfite.

The sulfite compounds can then be separated from. the

65 phosphates and decomposed by heat to form lime and

sulfur dioxide which can be recycled for reuse in the

process.

Product: Pounds H2S04 required per unit P20 5

Phosphoric acid 41.5 40

Mono-calcium phosphate 27.8

Di-calcium phosphate 13.9

3,359,067

METHOD FOR THE RECOVERY OF CALC~

PHOSPHATES FROM HIGH LIME CONTENT

PHOSPHATE ORES

Angus V. Henrickson, Golden, and Emo L. Coltrinari, 5

Arvada, Colo., assignors, by mesne assiguments, to Susquehanna

Western, Inc., Denver, Colo., a corporation

of Wisconsin

No Drawing. Filed Dec. 17, 1962, Ser. No. 244,930

11 Claims. (CI. 23-109)

This provides an indication of the amount of sulfuric

acid required to produce the various phosphates.

While the cost of sulfuric acid necessary for the standard

sulfuric acid process is not 'prohibitive when used on

a commercial grade ore containing around 31% phosphorous

pentoxide, it is prohibitive for low grade-low

phosphate ores existing in quantities in various parts of the

country having a P20 5 content of around 21 %.

The above emphasizes the importance of developing a

method for producing usable phosphates from low-grade

phosphate are, which is cheaper than a process utilizing

sulfuric acid. A method which has been extensively tested

in the past involves the use of sulfurous acid in the leaching

step to dissolve the tri-calcium phosphate in the phosphate

are. Past attempts to use this acid have been economically

unsuccessful mainly because the production of

usable phosphate involves the addition of prohibitively

high cost materials and no feasible expedient was availa,

ble for the reuse of the sulfurous acid or the sulfur dioxide

from which it was made, and no economically feasible

method was available for separating the usable

phosphate from the other components of the solution

formed by the reaction of sulfurous acid on the tri-calcium

phosphate.

This invention relates to a method for the recovery of

usable phosphates from high lime content phosphate ores.

More particularly, the invention relates to such a method

in which the phosphates in the ore are brought into solution

in the leaching step by the use of sulfurous acid.

One method for the production of usable phosphates

from phosphate rock involves the use of sulfuric acid

in an amount sufficient to convert the phosphorous content

to a predominantly monocalcium phosphate solution,

Le., a solution having a minor but appreciable quantity

of phosphorous present as phosphoric acid. The cost of

the acid used is an important consideration as respects

the economic feasibility of the process; it follows also

that the amount of the acid used is an important factor

in the cost. The phosphate constituent of phosphate rock

is predominantly tri-calcium phosphate. The reaction between

the tri-calcium phosphate and sulfuric acid may

be looked upon as a successive addition of acid to phosphate.

The addition of one hydrogen ion per phosphate

radical to the tri-calcium phosphate would result in the

formation of di-calcium phosphate, the addition of two

hydrogen ions per phosphate would give mono-calcium

phosphate and the addition of three hydrogen ions results

in phosphoric acid. The theoretical sulfuric acid requirements

per unit of phosphorous pentoxide to produce 35

various phosphates from tri-calcium phosphate are as

follows:

,

3,359,067

18.3

18.8

12.7

13.7

14.5

17.5

Solution Assay

P,O"g.p.!.

1.2

1.0

1.0

0.9

0.9

1.0

1.0

1.0

pH

200 21.5% ---_

1,160 15.4g.p.L____ 82.0

25.6 17.9%_________ 18.0

RESULTS

4

TABLE II

TABLE III

TABLE II-Continued

DETAILED LEACH DATA

o

2.5

6.0

9.0

14.0

23.0

27.0

31. 5

46.5.

Agitation Time;

Hours

TEST NO. 2

SO, Leaching at 10: 1 Dilution, Temperature 3° C.

Single Stuge

CONDITIONS

100 grams 01 -100 mesh ore

Temperature, 3° C. Dilution, 10: 1

Mechanical agitation in 2 liter flask

Agitation time 48 hours total

SO, bubbled through pUlp continuously

CONDITIONS

66;7 grams 01-100 mesh ore

Temperature, 3° C. Dilution 15: 1

Mechanical agitation in 2 liter flask

Agitation time 44 hours total

SO, bubbled through pulp continuously

DETAILED LEACE: DATA

TEST NO.3

SO, Leaching at 15: 1 Dilution, Temperature 3° C.

Single Stage

Heads _

Filtrate plus WasIL _

Tails _

TABLE I 45

3

In the leaching of the ore with S02 a slurry of finely

ground ore and water is formed and diluted to about 15

parts of water to 1 of ore. The high dilutions were required

because it was discovered that there is a limit to

the solubility of phosphate in solution in the presence 5

of high concentrations of calcium bi-sulfite. The pH of

the solution is maintained at about 1 the temperature at

about 4° centigrade and the 802 is bubbled through the

slurry fora peliod of about 24 hours.

The phosphate from Wyoming ore is relatively easy 10

to dissolve if there is sufficient ,acid present to hold the

pH of the solution down to about land at least below

1.5. The important point in obtaining high leach extraction

is to have enough free acid present. Since sulfur

dioxide gas in water forms sulfurous acid which is a 15

weak acid, the concentl1ation of sulfur dioxide in solution

must be quite high in order to have enough free hydrogen

ions to dissolve the phosphate. This high concentration

of 8°2.is maintained by conducting the process at

a low temperature. 20

The leaching procedure by which the experimental

data given in Tables I-VI below was produced is as

follows: The ore used as heads for all the sulfur dioxide

leaching was the Wyoming high lime content phosphate

rock described above. 'Portions of this ore were ground 25

to 100 mesh size in a pulverizer. The particle size, however,

is not critical. Weighed amounts of the finely

ground material were mixed with an appropriate amount Weight, Ass,y Distribution

of distilled water in a 2 liter "resin flask" equipped with Grams P,O, ~~ic~~t

a propeller agitator and set in a cold water bath.· The 30 ----------1---1------1----temperature

of this bath was kept low by mechanical

refrigeration. During leaching, gaseous 100% 802 was

bubbled through the pulp via a glass frit at a slow rate.

At proper time intervals a sample of the pulp was with·

drawn and allowed to settle while maintained at the 35

reduced temperature. A portion of the supernatant

liquor was decanted for assay and the rest of the sample

returned to the leach slurry. At the completion of leaching,

the entire pulp was filtered, washed with water and

the solids dried, weighed and analyzed for P205' The 40

filtrate plus wash. solution was measured and analyzed

for P205' The data from the tests is presented in

Tables I-V below:

Assay

P,O,

66.7 22.1% • __

1,100 13.4g.p.L____ 98.9

13.6 1.3%__________ 1.1

RESULTS

Weight,

Grams

TABLE IV

Agitation Time, pE: Solution Assay

Hours P,O"g.p.l.

---

0 ------- 0

3.5 1.0 9.52

19.0 1.4 13.35

23.0 1.0 13.42

27.0 1.0 13.40

44.0 1.0 ----~----------

Heads _

Filtrato plus wash _

Tails •__

55

50

Distribution

oIF,O"

60 1 1 1 percent_

65

Agitation Time, pH Solution Assay

Hours P,O"g.p.!.

0 8.7 0

1.2 1.7 4.0

5 1.7 7.2

13 1.4 8.7

17 1.7 10.2

21 1.7 10.6

25 1.7 11.1

39 1.7 10.8

DETAILED LEACH DATA

TEST NO. 1

SO, Leaching at 5: 1 dilution, Eoom Temperature

Single Stage

CONDITIONS

200 grams 01 -100 mesh ore

Temperature, 18° C. Dilution, 5: 1

Mechanical agitation in 2 liter flask

Agitation time, 39 hours total

SO, bubbled through pulp continuously

RESULTS

75

200 21.5% _

1,050 10.89 g.p.L___ 26.3

E:eads _

Filtrate plus wasIL _

Weight,

Grams

Dlstrlbntion

oIF,O" 70

percent

TEST NO.4

SO, Leaching at 5: 1, Temperature, 3° C.

2 Stages

CONDITIONS

200 grams 01 ~100 mesh ore

'femperature, 3° C. Dilution 5: 1

Mechanical agitation in 2 liter flask

Agitation time, first stage 47 hours, second stage 22

hours, 69 hours total

SO, bubbled through pulp continuously

5

TABLE IV-Continued

DETAILED LEACH DATA

3,359,067

6

TABLE V-Continued

RESULTS

TABLE VI.-SUMMARY OF S02 LEACH TESTS

1Calculated on assumption that P,O, in the solid sample from .1st stage

would have contributed its contained P,O, during 2d stage leaching.

The following Table VI gives a summary of the S02

leach tests:

20

22.1% _

19.4% _

17.7 g.p.!..__ 48.0 _

15.6 g.p.L___ 150.6 98.6

20..14%g.p.!..__ 1.1 99.7_

L7% _

.3%_______ .3 _

Extraction,

Percent

Distribution of

P,O,

Percent Cum.

Percent

No. of

Stages

Assay

P,O,

Dilution

per Stage

Weight

Grams

Test No.

5

15

Heads (Assayed) _

10 Heads (Calculated)______ 200

Filtrate 1st stage_________ 1,050

Filtrate 2d stage_________ 1,420

Filtrate 3d stage__ __ _____ 1,000

Toils 1st stage _

Tails 2d stage _

Final Tails______________ 38

RESULTS

Agitation Time,

I

pH

I

Solution Assay

Hours P,O"g.p.1.

First Stage

0.0 8.7 0

1.0 1.5 4.10

5.5 1.8 9.91

9.5 1.4 9.98

13.5 1.4 10.15

17.5 1.4 14.68

21.5 1.1 17.00

24.5 1.4 16.82

39.0 1.4 15.32

47.0 1.3 --.------------

Second Stage

0.0 .------ ---------------

3.25 1. 07 10.60

11.00 1. 00 12.20

2L50 1.20 -------------- .

..

Weight

Assay

, Assay

P,O,

Distribution of

P,O,

Percent Cum.

Percent

5:1

10:1

15:1

5:1

5:1

111

2

3

26.3

82.0

98.9

95.9

99.6

DETAILED LEACH DATA

TESTNO.5

SO, Leaching at 5:1 Dilution, Temperature, 3" C.

Three Stages

Agitation Time, I pH I Solution Assay

Hours P,O" g.p.1.

CONDITIONS

200 grams of -100 mesh ore

Temperature, 3" C. Dilution 5:1

Mechanical agitation in a 2 liter flask

Agitation time stage 1, 48 hours, stage 2, 44 hours,

stage 3, 24 hours, total 116 hours

SO, bubbled through pulp continuously

30

The test for which results are shown in Table I was

made at' room temperature and at as: 1 dilution. The

extraction of phosphate in solution (26.3%) was so low

that it was not considered necessary even to analyze the

35 solid tails. This test indicated that there was a limiting

solubility of phosphate in solution which affected the

extraction. The tests of Tables II and III were performed

at low temperature with successively higher dilution.

Since the extraction increased from 82% at 10: 1 dilution

40 to ,98.9% at 15: Ldilution, it was, obvious that the concentration

of phosphate in solution is a controlling factor

in leach extraction. This .is an important feature of the

invention. 'The, 15: 1 dilution for the tests of Table III

provided the most. effective leach extraction. The results

45 of Tables IV and V show that successive extl'actions at

low dilutions have results comparable to a single stage

leach at higher dilutions. In the tests producing the

results of Table IV, two successive 5: 1 dilution leaches

gave a 95.9% extraction (compared with 82% for a

50 single stage leach at a 10:'1 dilution) . In the test giving

the test results of Table V, three successive 5: 1 leaches

gave 99.6% extraction compared to 98.9% for a single

stage at 15: 1 dilution.

As the results tabulated illustrate, for the high lime

55 content are a large ratio of water to ore ora large

volume of solution is required to keep the phosphate dissolved.

This condition is 'achieved by leaching at a ratio

of water to ore of 10 or more to 1, or by successive

leaches starting with lower ratios of water to ore. The

60 ratio of water to ore in the final leach to achieve a high

recovery must be 10 or more of water to 1 of ore. The

above tests established that sulfur dioxide treatment of

phosphate ores under the above conditions dissolves

essentially all the phosphate from its ores and is a com-

6fi mercially feasible process.

The leaching step, of course, is not restricted to the

specific type ore used for the above tests but may be

used for lower or higher grade ore.

However, the invention provides a commercially feasi-

70 ble process for recovery of over 98% of phosphate values

from high lime content ores in which the P20S content

is less than about 30%. As stated above there was no

commercially feasible process for recovery of phosphate

from these high lime content ores prior to this invention.

75 The following is an assay of Wyoming phosphate ore

0.27

0.27

o

6.82

11. 75

15.25

15.25

15.50

19.4

14.1

17.1

17.6

18.2

20.9

2L5% , _

19.2g.p.L___ 56.2

14.3 g.p.L__ 39.4 95.6

4.4%_______ 4.4 _

L3

Ll

1.1

1.0

L5

LO

LO

LO

1.0

8.5

1.4

L2

LO

LO

0.9

LO

LO

1.0

First Stage

Third Stage

Second Stage

TABLE V

200 '

1,250

1,165

43.8

o

4.5

7.5

23.25

0.0

4.0

20.0

24.0

28.0

29.0

44.0

o

, 2.5

6.0

9.0

14.0

23.0

27.0

3L5

47.5

",

Heads _

Filtrate plus wash #L _

TFialitlrsate plus wash #2 __

3,359,067

7

(Stambaugh Creek sample), the type ore used for the

tests set forth herein:

Assays

Percent

P

2

0

S

--____ 22.4

CaO 421

F 1.4

CO

2

._____________________ .8.1

Si0

2

16.9

AI

2

0

s

2.4

Fe20S 1.5

MgO 1.2

SOs 2.2

L.O.I. (1000° C.) ~____________ 9.5

Insol ,______________ 16.7

UsGs -__________ 0.02

V

2

0

S

0.004

Mo ~______________________________________ nil

g

of pure phosphoric acid solution and their distribution

coefficients determined. The results. of these tests are set

forth in Table VII below. The distribution constant, indicated

by Ka 0, is defined as Ka °= gm. HSP04 per liter of

5 organic phase divided by grams of HSP04 per liter of

aqueous phase. In performing the test, 100 milliliters of

the solvents were equilibrated with 100 ml. of a .5 molar

(49.2 g.p.I.) H3P04 solution in a cylindrical graduated

separatory funnel. The mixture was agitated vigorously

10 with a mechanical stirrer for ten minutes and allowed to

separate into two phases. The volume of each phase was

measured and the phosphoric acid remaining in the aqueous

phase was titrated with standardized sodium hydrox-

15 ide and the concentration of each phase calculated..The

resulting data as well as the distribution coefficient for

each solvent at the particular phosphoric acid concentration

is given in Table VII:

TABLE VII.-SCREENING TEST

[Extraction of H,PO, from ,5 M H,PO, solutlonl

Volume of- H,PO,ln-

Organic Aqueous Organic Aqueous

N-butanoL _______________ .. __ .- _-- -- 111 89 6.48 47.2 0.14

N-amylAlcohoL. __ •_.. ___ •__ -- _---- 104 96 1.15 49.0 0.02

2-octanoL___________ •_________ -- _.. _. 100 100 0 49.3 0

tri·Butyl Phospbate___ .... ___ .... ___ 108 92 5.74 47.1 .0.12.

tri·Capryl Amine (10% in kerosene) __ 103 97 17.6 37.3 0.47

Calculated composition

Cas(P04h Per4c9en.0t

CaF

2

~ __-_________ 2.9

Si0

2

- .______ 16.9

CaCO

s ~__________________________ 21.0

CaS04 3.8

MgCO

s

_ 2.6

Al

2

0

s

2.4

Fe20S 1.5

Water and organic 1.4

The preferred concentration range for the slurry is lO

or more parts of water to 1 of ore by weight. The pH

value of the solution must be less than about 1.5. The

temperature at which the sulfurous acid is reacted with

the slurry is preferably from just -above the freezing point

of the solution up to about 10° C. The freezing point of

the solution would always be below 0° C.

The solution formed by the reaction of sulfurous acid

on the ore contains essentially mono·calcium phosphate

and calcium bi-sulfite as solutes with lesser amounts of

other phosphates andsulfites. The method contemplates

the separation of the phosphates and sulfites in such a

way as to produce a relatively pure phosphate product

and calcium sulfite. Calcium sulfite is then roasted to

liberate sulfur dioxide for recycling to the leaching circuit.

The two components can be separated by crystallization

using techniques well known in the art. A crystallization

process for the separation of the sulfite and phosphate

components of the leach solution is disclosed in

U.S. Patent 2,899,271. Solvent extraction tests are briefly

described below which indicate that the phosphate values

can be separated as HSP04 by this method also; with refinement

the method might be commercially feasible.

It is well known that there are many organic liquids,

immiscible in water, which will dissolve phosphoric acid.

Accordingly, to use these liquids it is necessary to convert

the phosphates present to HSP04. If the leach solution is

kept at a high concentration of sulfurous acid, the calcium

phosphate salt is converted to phosphoric acid.

Five organic.. liquids were tested by batch extractions

It is noted. from Table VII. that the distribution coeffi35

cients of N-amyl alcohol and 2-octanol are too low to

justify their use for commercial application.

The distribution constants of the other three show that

they can be used for the extraction of phosphoric acid

from pure phosphoric acid solutions. Further tests of nor-

40 mal butyl alcohol as a solvent showed that the presence

of sulfurous acid in relatively high concentrations did not

noticeably interfere with the extraction of phosphoric acid

although significant amounts of S02 were adsorbed by

the solvent. It appears, therefore, that the solvent extrac-

45 tion method, with proper refinement, might offer attractive

possibilities for commercial adaptation in separating the

phosphate values as HSP04 from the leach solution.

The calcium sulfite remaining in the aqueous phase

after solvent extraction of HSP04 by whatever method is

50 used can be recovered by evaporation and crystallization

by well known techniques. It is then decomposed by

roasting into calcium oxide and sulfur dioxide, the latter

being returned to the leaching circuit for Jreatment of

fresh ore. Accordingly, the overall process of recovering

55 calcium values from high lime content ores can be used

either as a batch process or as a continuous process.

It is thus seen that the invention prOVides a novel

process for the recovery of usable phosphates from high

lime content ores having a phosphate content. based on

60 P20s as low as 21.2%. The improved leaching step in the

process, as described herein, effecting over 99% solution

of ore phosphate is a significant contribution to the commercial

feasibility of the overall process.

Although the invention has been illustrated and de-

65 scribed with reference to the preferred embodiments thereof,

it is to be understood that it is in no way limited to the

details of such embodiments, but is capable of numerous

modifications within the scope of the appended claims.

What is claimed is:

70 1. The process for recovering phosphate. values from

phosphate ores which comprises: forming a water slurry

of the ore in which the ratio of water to ore by weight is

greater than about 10 parts of water to 1 part of ore,

leaching the slurry at a temperature between the freezing

75 temperature of the slurry arid about lOO-c;-with concen,

3,359,067

References Cited

UNITED STATES PATENTS

4/1.891 Lisenberg 23-189 X

5/1915 Stewart 23-109

1/1918 Blumenberg 23-109

450,243

1,137,806

1,251,741

40 OSCAR R. VERTIZ, Primary Examiner.

L. A. MARSH, 0. F. CRUTCHFIELD,

Assistant Examiners.

10

the temperature of the slurry during leaching between

the freezing point of the slurry and about '100 C. to form

calcium sulphites, calcium phosphates and phosphoric

acid.

9. The process of claim 1 in which the recovered suIphites

are heated to produce sulphur dioxide, and the

sulphur dioxide recovered is recycled for reuse in the

process.

10. The process of claim 4 in which the phosphoric

10 acid is recovered by solvent extraction with an extractant

selected from the group consisting of N-butanol, tri-butyl

phosphate and tri-capryl amine.

11. A process for recovering phosphoric acid from

high lime content ores of calcium phosphates having a

15 P20 S content between about 20 to 30 percent, which comprises:

forming a water slurry of the ore in which the

ratio of water to ore by weight is from about 10: 1 to

about 15:1, leaching the slurry at a temperature between

the freezing point of the slurry and about 40 C. with con-

20 centrated sulfur dioxide at a pH between about 1 and

about 1.5 to maintain the leach solution at a high concentration

of sulfurous acid and form calcium sulfites and

phosphoric acid, extracting the phosphoric acid from the

slurry by solvent extraction with a substantially water im-

25 miscible organic extractant medium, concentrating the

slurry by heating it, roasting the formed concentrate of

calcium sulfites to produce sulfur dioxide, and recycling

the sulfur dioxide for reuse in the process, whereby about

98 percent of the original P20 S content of the ore is re-

30 covered and a portion of the sulfur dioxide necessary for

the leaching step is conserved.

9

trated sulphur dioxide at a pH between about 1 and 1.5

to maintain the leach solution at a high concentration of

sulfurous acid and form a solution containing calcium

sulphites, calcium phosphates and phosphoric acid, recovering

sulphur dioxide from the sulphites and recycling 5

it for reuse in the process, and selectively removing the

sulphites, phosphates and phosphoric acid from the slurry.

2. The process of claim 1 in which the step of recovering

and recycling sulphur dioxide is performed after selectively

removing the phosphates and phosphoric acid

from the slurry.

3. The process of claim 1 in which the ratio of water

to ore in said slurry is about 15 to 1 by weight and the

temperature of the slurry during leaching is maintained

at about 40 C.

4. The process of claim 1 in which the ratio of water

to ore in the final slurry is achieved by starting at a

ratio of water to ore of about 5 to 1 followed by successive

extractions of the leach solution to result in a total

cumulative ratio of water to ore by weight greater than

about 10 to 1.

5. The process of claim 1 in which a high concentration

of sulphurous acid formed by the S02 treatment is maintained

in the slurry to convert at least a portion of the

phosphates to phosphoric acid, and the phosphoric acid

is separated from the sulphites in the solution by solvent

extraction.

6. The process of claim 1 in which the phosphates are

selectively removed from the slurry by crystallization.

7. The process of claim 1 in which the phosphate content

of the ore based on P20S is less than about 30 percent.

8. In the process for recovering phosphate values from

phosphate ores in which the leaching is performed by introduction

of sulfur dioxide into the slurry of water and

ore to form sulfurous acid and the formed phosphoric 35

acid and phosphates are selectively removed from the

slurry, the improvement which comprises forming a slurry

in which the ratio of water to ore is at least about 10 parts

of water to 1 part of ore by weight, maintaining the pH

of the slurry between about 1 and 1.5 during the leaching

by the introduction of sulfur dioxide, and maintaining


Source URL: https://www.hazenresearch.com/3359067-method-recovery-calcium-phosphates-high-lime-content-phosphate-ores