Published on Hazen Research (https://www.hazenresearch.com)


Patent Number/Link: 
3,767,543 Process for the electrolytic recovery of copper from its sulfide ores

United States Patent [19]

Hazen

[11] 3,767,543

[45] Oct. 23, 1973

[54] PROCESS FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC

RECOVERY OF COPPER FROM ITS

SULFIDE ORES

805,969

415,738

333,815

11/1905

11/1889

1/1886

Hybinette 204/112

Seegall 204/107

Body 204/107

[56]

3,464,904

1,726,258

1,539,713

1,485,909

1,456,784

1,441,063

1,435,891

1,434,088

1,128,315 7 Claims, 1 Drawing Figure

Primary Examiner-John H. Mack

Assistant Examiner-R. L. Andrews

Attorney....:.·Sheridan, Ross & Fields

[57] ABSTRACT

An improvement in the ferric chloride leach recovery

of copper from its sulfide ores which comprises recovery

of the copper from the leach solution after removal

of sulfur by electrolysis rather than by conventional

cementation with added iron.

FOREIGN PATENTS OR APPLICATIONS

66,547 1/1893 Germany

OTHER PUBLICATIONS

Principles of Electroplating & Electroforming by Blum

et aI., 3rd ed.; 1949, pgs. 68-69.

The Electromotive Series, "Simple Methods for Analyzing

Plating Solutions," 7th ed, 1949, Hanson-Van

Winkle-Munning Co., p. 20.

References Cited

UNITED STATES PATENTS

9/1969 Brace 204/105

8/1929 Christensen 204/117

5/1925 Christensen 204/111

3/1924 Christensen 75/104

5/1923 Christensen 204/117

1/1923 Christensen 75/1 04

11/1922 Christensen 75/104

10/1922 Christensen 75/104

2/1915 Hybinette 204/106

Inventor: Wayne C. Hazen, Denver, Colo.

Assignee: Hazen Research, Inc., Golden, Colo.

Filed: June 28, 1971

Appl. No.: 157,281

U.S. CI. 204/107,204/52 R

Int. CI. C22d 1/16, C23b 5/20

Field of Search 204/1 07, 52 R;

75/117

[52]

[51 ]

[58]

[75]

[73]

[22]

[21 ]

"'"C :>

,--.-.-.4,

Z,...,

CJ

CI

-C":l f\)

w

as

~

w.

-...l

0)

.-...l .

CJl

AW

IRON

OPPER

::0

ICHALCOPYRITE I

-i LEACH ING1

PURIFICATION FOR

IFILTRATION1 SOLUTION REMOVAL OF

~

BISMUTH, LEAD,

SOLIDS

SILVER

ELEMENTAL

SULPHUR

SULPHUR RECOVERY

~

BY SOLVENT EXTRACTION

ELECTROLYSIS IN

FLOTATION, MELTING ' DIAPHRAGM CELL C

/\ ~

:t:>

~ ~

n,

,

RESIDUE TO BE

TREATED FOR

ELECTROLYSIS IN

RECOVERY OF GOLD DIAPHRAGM. CELL

FERRIC CHLORIDE SOLUTION r

h

-t

<~ ~.'

n,

~

3,767,543

2

copper in solution as copper chloride. To the extent

that iron is present in the sulfide mineral, as for example

in chalcopyrite, this iron is dissolved as ferrous

chloride and the associated sulfur is oxidized to ele-

In the present methods of treating copper sulfide ores 5 mental sulfur as is the case with the copper sulfide.

for the recovery of copper the general practice involves The ferric chloride leaching has very little effect

smelting the sulfides and through a complex series of upon the mineral pyrite when present by itself but, in

smelting operations driving off the sulfur as sulfur diox- general, will attack most sulfides such as pyrrhotite,

ide to produce a crude copper metal which is subse- chalcopyrite, chalcocite, sphalerite, and the like. Once

quently refined by electrolysis. This process is an an- 10 the leaching reaction has taken place and the metallic

cient one which has been responsible for the produc- elements are in solution as the chloride the sulfur retion

of most of the copper in the history of the world mains in the residue as elemental sulfur. In this reaction

but suffers from some serious drawbacks. One very se- the ferric chloride is reduced to ferrous chloride. The

rious drawback of a smelting operation is that the sulfur slurry is removed from the leaching vessel and sulfur is

dioxide produced from some steps of the operation is 15 separated by any standard method such as filtration or

of such low grade that it is very uneconomical to pro- countercurrent decantation thereby separating it from

duce sulfuric acid from it by means of the contact pro- the metal. It can be seen that this is obviously a great

ce.ss and, accordingly, most smelting operations dis- advantage because the sulfur has been converted to a

charge this low grade sulfur dioxide waste gas into the form that can be recovered and sold while the metallic

atmosphere. This creates a serious pollution problem 20 elements remain in solution as chlorides for subsequent

and for this reason the smelting process is the subject treatment.

of intense investigative efforts at the present time to In the process described in the Canadian Department

find ways of avoiding this pollution of the atmosphere. of Mines publications, the leach solution containing

In addition to the above disadvantage a smelting op- copper chloride and ferrous chloride is treated by ceeration

is economical only if done on a large scale and 25 mentation in which metallic iron is added to the soluthis

accounts for the growth of central smelting facili- tion and the copper thereby precipitated as cement

ties with the result that the capital investment for a copper. This procedure, of course, increases the quansmelting

complex is large. Small mine operators who tity of iron in solution which must be removed eventuproduce

copper sulfide concentrate cannot afford the ally and produces a copper of relatively low grade that

heavy capital investment of the pyrometallurgical 30 must be purified and retreated. The solution remaining

smelters and must therefore sell the output of their after electrolytic removal of copper and contained lead

mines to companies already possessing such facilities. is then subjected to a second electrolysis where the iron

This oftentimes leads to high shipping charges and high is removed by deposition on a cathode in an electrosmelter

toll fees. lytic cell and some ofthe ferrous chloride in the anolyte

Over the years many efforts have been made to find 35 is oxidized to ferric chloride, thus regenerating the

means of treating copper sulfide minerals by other leaching reagent for reuse.

methods than the ordinary smelting practice. Among In this flowsheet the amount of electrolytic iron

these are processes in which the copper sulfide is first which must be recovered is the total amount dissolved

roasted to a mixture of copper oxide and copper sulfate from the original concentrate feed and the amount

with the production of by-product sulfur dioxide gas of 40 which was added during the cementation for removal

a concentration high enough to permit its economic of the copper. The disadvantage of the recovery of the

conversion into sulfuric aci& copper in this way is that the copper which is produced

Certain features of this process have disadvantages. is of relatively low grade and is made expensive be-

The calcine from the furnace which contains the cop- causeofthe cost of theiron which is added. In addition,

per as a mixture of oxide and sulfate is leached with an 45 this added quantity of iron must then be removed from

acidic solution thereby producing a strong copper sul- the circuit by electrolysis in the next stage thereby refate

solution. This copper sulfate solution is then sepa- quiring a considerable increase in the size of the elecrated

from the insoluble materials and subjected to trolytic circuit that is required for the total iron. reelectrolysis

to produce copper metal and sulfuric acid. moval with consequent increase in the cost for recov-

The latter is in such weak solution that it cannot be 50 ery of the copper.

economically utilized, so that the loss of this by- In the flowsheet of this invention the teaching of the

product is a disadvantage. Furthermore, the disposal of Canadian Department of Mines' process can be folthe

weak sulfuric acid solution presents an economic lowed as far as the leaching and separation of liquids

problem. . . 55 and solids but the improvement lies in the method of

Another effort to solve the problem of recovery of recovering the copper. It has been found, surprisingly,

copper values from copper sulfide minerals is the ferric that it is possible to remove copper from the ferric

chloride leaching method. This method has been stud- chloride leach solution by electrolysis. Ordinary elecied

at great length in various laboratories and particu- trolysis of copper universally uses sulfuric acid solution

larly in the Canadian Department of Mines many years 60 as the electrolyte from which the copper is deposited

ago. (See "Investigations in Ore Dressing and Metal- on a cathode. It has been found that by conducting the

lurgy 1924,"Canada, Department of Mines, Mines electrolysis in a diaphragm-type cell, it is possible to re-

Branch, John McLeish, Director, No. 643.) In this pro- move the copper at quite high efficiency and high curcess,

the copper sulfide minerals are agitated with a hot rent density and at the same time generate ferric chlosolution

containing a high concentration of ferric chlo- 65 ride in the anolyte compartment. This not only removes

ride. The ferric chloride acts as an oxidizing agent to the requirement for the addition of iron in order to preattack

the copper bearing sulfide minerals thereby con- cipitate the copper but it regenerates the leaching reverting

the sulfide to elemental sulfur and putting the agent, ferric chloride, whereas the previous process pe-

1

PROCESS FOR THE ELECTROLYTllC RECOVERY

OF COPPER FROM ITS SULFIDE ORES

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

3,767,543

4

Perlodle Cumulative

60 0 0

66 5.5 5.5

67 12. !I 18. 4

65 25.7 44.1

68 25.3 69.4

71 21. 9 91. 3

69 5.9 97.2

72 .. __ .. .. .... _

71 .. .. _.. _

64.8

61.1

52.5

35.4

18.5

3.9

0.01

0.002

0.004

Catholyte

a./I., Temp.,

Elapsed time, hours Cu 0 C.

iron to ferric at the anode. If insufficient ferrous iron

is available for oxidation, chlorine is also produced at

the anode.

In the first test the cell was filled with electrolyte medium

which contained 65 g/l copper and 135 g/l iron.

Approximately 100 cc/hr of 135 g/1 ferrous chloride

solution was added to the cathode compartment and 12

amps were passed through the cell. After 8 hours of operation

when practically all of the copper was plated

out the test was terminated. The cathode had increased

in weight by 116 grams. The voltage used was, of

course, below the voltage requirement for the deposition

of iron. The bulk of the cathode deposit was hard

and coherent, but about 10 grams was spongy and contained

only 70% copper. Data collected during the run

are shown in the following table.

o..._.. ...... __ _..

1. .. _.. __ _

2 . __ ... _

3 __ _

4. . ....

5 .. .. _

6 .. .. __

7 __ .......... .. _

8 .. ...... _

30

The above results show that the process produces over

35 99 percent recovery of the copper in solution.

The iron in solution, of course, is electrolytically recovered

in a subsequent stage by conventional electrolysis

with simultaneous formation of ferric chloride

which is recycled to the initial leach stage in a commer-

40 cial process for treatment of copper sulfide concentrate.

Tests were run at various current densities to determine

the most favorable current density ranges for

forming spongy or coherent copper deposits, and to

45 test the efficiency of the process as applied to low copper

content electrolytes which correspond to electrolytes

resulting from leaching low copper content concentrates.

In the second test the copper content of the used

50 catholyte from the first test was increased to 2 g/l copper

by the addition of cupric chloride. The solution

added to the cathode compartment during electrolysis

contained 180 gil ferrous iron and 36 g/l copper. The

solution was added at approximately 160 cc/hr while

55 12 amps were passed through the cell. Approximately

36 grams of copper were added to the cell. At no time

was the catholyte ab,ove 0.66 g/l copper. Approximately

all of the copper in solution was deposited at the

60 ~;:~~~' half of which was coherent and the remainder

In the third test all conditions were the same as the

second test except that 24 amps were used and the solution

flow was increased to 335 cc/hr. In this test sub65

stantially all of the copper in solution was deposited as

a spongy deposit.

The fourth test was also similar to those of the second

test except that only 6 amps were used and the solution

nalized the circuit by the addition of iron above that in

the concentrate which had to be removed subsequently.

The net result of the present procedure is a significant

reduction in the capital expense of a plant and

the operating cost thereof for producing copper from 5

sulfide minerals.

In ordinary electrowinning practice for copper a considerable

effort is made to restrict the quantity of iron

which is in solution with the copper. If the iron content

of the solution becomes high (for example, 10g/1), a 10

lowering of the current efficiency is observed and a

change in the physical character of the deposited copper

may take place. Also, if the iron content is very

high, the current efficiency for the electrodeposition of

the copper may drop to such a low value as to render 15

the operation uneconomic. Therefore, the fact that the

copper can be deposited from a solution which contains

above 100 g/l of iron as ferric chloride is quite

surprising. The reason that the iron does not appreciably

interfere with the current efficiency is probably be- 20 _

cause the electrolysis is done in a diaphragm cell so that

the ferric iron which is formed at the anode cannot mix

and come in contact with the deposited copper to redissolve

it. Therefore, by performing the electrolysis in

this manner, it is possible to take advantage of the elec- 25

tric current being used to deposit the copper and at the

same time regenerate the leaching reagent without paying

the penalty of low current efficiency ordinarily encountered

when electrolysing a copper solution high in

iron.

The iron in the solution after the electrolytic removal

of copper is recovered by conventional electrolysis.

This amount of iron is, of course, restricted to that

which existed in the concentrate. Other metals are recovered

by conventional means.

The process of the invention as illustrated in the accompanying

drawing, a flow sheet of the process, will

now be described, along with the equipment used.

The tests for which results are given below were performed

using a ferrous chloride electrolyte medium

having various adjusted concentrations of iron and to

which cupric chloride was added in amounts to provide

various concentrations of copper. The electrolyte medium

simulated the leach solution which exists after

copper sulfide concentrate is leached with ferric chloride.

The equation representing the chemical reaction

in the leaching step is:

4 Fe Cb + Cu Fe 82 ...... Cu CI2 + 5 Fe Cl2 + 28.

After the sulfur is removed the electrolyte media contains

essentially ferrous chloride and cupric chloride as

does the electrolyte medium used in the tests.

A diaphragm cell was used in all tests. It consisted of

a 1,500 cc cathode compartment separated from a 300

cc anode compartment by a Dynel filter cloth diaphragm.

The anode compartment was equipped with a

solution overflow. The anode was high purity graphite

and had approximately a 0.1 sq.ft. area immersed. The

cathode was a sheet of 22-gauge copper with approximately

0.33 sq.ft. submerged. During each of the tests,

ferrous chloride electrolyte medium was continuously

added to the cathode compartment. This solution

flowed through the diaphragm into the anode compartment

and out of the cell. The pH of the electrolyte was

maintained at about 2.3 or below.

The electrolytic reactions are reduction of the copper

to metal at the cathode and oxidation of ferrous

3,767,543

5

flow was reduced to only 85 cc/hr. Practically all of the

copper deposited was in a coherent form.

The data from the tests where the catholyte copper

composition was kept low could be summarized as fol_

lOWS:

These results indicate that copper can be quantitatively

recovered from concentrated ferrous chloride solutions

( 180 gil iron and above) by electrowinning. At current

densities below about 20 asf the deposit is coherent and

above 20 asf the deposit contains a gradually increasing

amount of spongy material with practically all of it

being spongy above about 70 asf. Copper solutions can

be plated down to less than 0.1 gil copper. The percentage

recovery of copper is not affected appreciatively

by the concentration of the copper solution.

Wltile the invention has been ilIustrated by its application

to a flow sheet applied to calcopyrite, it is obviously

not limited to this mineral as it is equally applicable

to all concentrates of copper sulfide ores which can

be leached with ferric chloride.

I claim:

1. The process for recovering copper from chalcopy-

Amps

24 _

12 _

6 _

Effective

current

densityha.s.f. Deposit

(cat ode) description

80 All spongY.

40 Half spongy.

20 Coherent.

6

rite concentrate which comprises:

a. leaching the concentrate with ferric chloride,

b. separating sulfur from the leach solution of (a),

c. subjecting the leach solution of (b) to electrolysis

5 in a diaphragm cell having an anode and cathode

to electroplate copper at the cathode while continuously

flowing ferrous chloride through the diaphragm

from the cathode to the anode to prevent

ferric ions from contacting the cathode.

10 2. The process of claim 1 in which the ferric chloride

is recovered at the anode and is recycled to step (a).

3. The process of claim 1 in which iron in solution is

recovered in a second electrolysis at the cathode and

ferric chloride is recovered at the anode and recycled

15 to step (a).

4. The process of claim 1 in which the pH of the leach

solution subjected to electrolysis is maintained at about

2.3 or below.

20 S. The process of claim 1 in which the iron content

of the leach solution subjected to electrolysis is up to

about 180 grams per liter.

6. The process of claim 1 in which a cathode current

density below about 20 asf is used for the electrolysis

25 of copper to produce a coherent deposit on the cathode.

7. The process of claim 1 in which a cathode current

density inexcess of about 70 asf is used in the electrolysis

of copper to provide a spongy deposit on the cath30

ode.

* * * * *

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE

CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION

Patent No. 3,767,543 Dated October 23, 1973

Inventor(s)--W-a-yne-C-.-H-az-en------------------

It is certified that error appears in the above-identified patent

and that said Letters Patent are hereby corrected as shown below:

Column 2,

--cementation--;

line 31 ~electrolyticn should be

line 32, "asecond" should be cancelled.

Signed and sealed this 15th day of October 1974.

(SEAL)

Attest:

McCOY M. GIBSON JR.

Attesting Officer

C. MARSl·L\.LL Di\NN

Commissioner of Patents

FORM PO-lOSO 00-69)

USCOMM-DC l10376'Pll~

'Jt u, S, GOVERNMENT "RINTIMG OFFIC[ ~ 19ft O-J'6-33",

Roman\�Tei��0�reast-font-family: HiddenHorzOCR'>values therefrom;

 

(e) extracting rhenium 'Values from the mother liquor

of (d) with a liquid water insoluble amine ion exchange

agent;

3,681,016

25 HERBERT T. CARl1ER, Primary Examiner

u.s. Cl. X.R.

8

ing the pH of rthe solution' to a pH between about

2.5-3.5;

(d) separating the crystallized ammonium tetramolybdate

from the mother liquor of (c);

(e) extracting rhenium values from the mother liquor

of (d) with a liquid water insoluble amine ion exchange

agent;

(f) stripping rhenium values from the loaded agent of

(e) with sodium hydroxide;

(g) recovering rhenium values from the strip solution

of (f) by extracting with pyridine; and

(h) recovering rhenium from the pyridine extractant

by distilling off the pyridine.

References Cited

UNITED STATES PATENTS

7/10969 Litz , 23-15 W

7/1969 !Platzke et al. 23-15W

3/1959 Zimmerley et al. 23-18 X

7/1960 Zimmerley et al. 23-24

4/1966 Churchward , 23~15 W

211970 Ziegenbaly et al. 23-23 X

1/1971 Proter et al. 23-22

3,455,'677

3,45:8,277

2,876,065

2,945,743

3,244,475

3,495,934

3,558,268

23-23, 24 R, 51 R

7

(f) stripping the loaded agent of (e) with an alkali

metal hydroxide;

(g) extracting rhenium values from the strip solution

of (f) with pyridine or pyridine derivative; and

(h) recovering rhenium from the pyridine extractant 5

by distilling off the pyridine.

2. The process of claim 1 in which metal ion impurities

are removed from the strip solution of .(b) before

crystallizing ammonium tetramolybdate in (c).

3. The process of claim 1 in which the anion exchange 10

agent in (a) is a tertiary amine ion exchange resin and the

stripping solution of (b) is ammonium hydroxide.

4. A process for recovering molybdenum and rhenium

values from pregnant acid leach solutions containing these

values together with other metal impurities and derived 15

from dusts and flue gases resulting from roasting relatively

impure molybdenite concentrate, said process comprising:

(a) extracting molybdenum and rhenium values from

the pregnant acid solution with a liquid water in- 20

soluble amine ion exchange agent;

(b) stripping the molybdenum and rhenium values

from the exchange resin with ammonium hydroxide

solution to form a strip solution containing the molybdenum

as ammonium molybdate and the rhenium

as ammonium perrhenate;

(c) crystallizing the molybendum from the strip solution

in (b) as ammonium tetramolybdate by adjust


Source URL: https://www.hazenresearch.com/3767543-process-electrolytic-recovery-copper-its-sulfide-ores